We will transfer the agreed processes, data and team knowledge from Apilo to ZYNQ. No leap into the unknown, no sales shutdown during preparation and no pressure to launch before testing is complete.
An honest comparison
Apilo is a mature multichannel platform with more than 600 integrations and the backing of the Shoper Group. It is a strong choice for companies requiring a broad catalogue of ready-made connections. ZYNQ is an alternative for organisations combining sales, WMS, documents and profitability with close product cooperation.
More than 600 integrations, including marketplaces, stores, couriers, ERP, WMS and wholesalers.
40+ integrations focused on the key channels and processes of ZYNQ customers.
Apilo has a significantly larger catalogue of ready-made connections.
Mature support for many Polish and international marketplaces and broad listing synchronisation.
Key channels connected with inventory, documents and profit analytics.
Apilo wins on reach, ZYNQ on end-to-end consistency.
Extensive rules for statuses, shipping, messages, invoices and post-sales operations.
Automations covering orders, inventory, documents, shipping and communication in one system.
Both systems offer broad automation.
Inventory, shipping and a Packing Assistant available in every subscription.
Multiple warehouses, branches, warehouse documents, Pick & Pack and dropshipping.
ZYNQ connects daily warehouse work with documents and branches more broadly.
A broad catalogue of ERP and accounting integrations, some delivered through integration partners.
Invoicing, KSeF and warehouse documents available inside one operational environment.
Apilo has more connections. ZYNQ can reduce the number of separate tools.
Reports and operational data supporting sales control.
GMV, margin, costs, AOV, channels, warehouses and products in one dashboard.
ZYNQ places clearer emphasis on margin and profitability.
Price depends on orders, listings, users, synchronisation speed, API limits, archive and add-ons.
A simpler model and potentially lower total cost when one system replaces administrative modules.
Apilo scales packages well. ZYNQ can simplify the total software stack.
A 21-day free trial and a Starter plan for lower sales volume.
A 14-day trial with configuration support from the ZYNQ team.
Apilo offers a longer standard trial.
Part of the Shoper Group, a certified Allegro integrator and supported by an implementation partner network.
A smaller product team with direct contact and a shorter decision path.
Apilo provides scale. ZYNQ provides closer cooperation.
Support, a helpline, knowledge base, support plans and expert-hour services.
A team that knows the customer’s implementation, processes and previous decisions.
ZYNQ is attractive when continuity and context matter.
An Individual plan, additional integrations and a partner implementation network.
Missing critical functions can enter an agreed roadmap before operations are switched.
Both offer adaptation through different cooperation models.
Companies expecting a very broad integration catalogue and a proven multichannel sales hub.
Companies connecting sales, WMS, documents and profitability while influencing product development.
The choice depends on whether catalogue scale or system coherence matters more.
Common concerns
Migration concerns are justified. We first show the plan, data scope, testing method and conditions for a safe launch.
Changing tools means new screens, names and habits. This is a real cost for employees.
How we address it: Before implementation, we analyse the current workflow and preserve familiar mechanisms where it makes sense. ZYNQ trains employees using their roles and real processes, not an abstract demo.
The biggest concern is downtime, order chaos and pressure to switch too early.
How we address it: ZYNQ coordinates the entire process. During configuration, the company continues working in its current system. Operations move only after tests, training and customer approval.
The current platform may include a function that ZYNQ does not yet provide as standard.
How we address it: We do not hide differences. Gaps are identified during the pre-implementation analysis. If a function is critical and fits the agreed scope, the technology team prepares a delivery schedule before switching.
Stability matters when a system handles sales, inventory and documents.
How we address it: ZYNQ operates transparently. We answer questions about architecture, backups, data security, administration, business continuity and support before the customer makes a decision.
Migration process
Each stage has a purpose, owner and completion condition. The customer always knows what is happening.
We discuss sales channels, warehouses, branches, documents, automations and employee roles.
We document processes, dependencies and exceptions, then identify what should remain, improve or be developed.
The customer receives the scope, sequence, responsibilities, test plan and conditions for a safe switch.
Both sides confirm exactly what must work in ZYNQ before migration begins.
We configure ZYNQ and transfer agreed data while daily operations continue in the existing system.
Each role learns its part of the process using real company scenarios.
After testing and approval, new orders, inventory, shipping and documents begin operating in ZYNQ.
After launch, we monitor work, gather team feedback and improve the configuration.
Few integrations, limited processes, short online training and a small team.
Multiple branches, warehouses, employees, integrations and processes requiring coordinated tests.
These are typical timelines. The schedule is confirmed after analysing the company scope.
We do not accelerate the switch at the expense of the team or customers. Launch follows testing, data verification, training and approval.
Data scope
Migration must restore the company’s ability to work. We analyse data, configuration and relationships, then confirm scope after inspecting the source.
We map rule conditions and outcomes, then reproduce their operation in ZYNQ.
We transfer agreed catalogues, inventory, price lists and warehouse structures after checking source data.
We recreate account connections and map listing identifiers for supported channels.
We configure mailboxes, message templates and customer-service communication rules.
The scope of order history is agreed after auditing export and API capabilities on the customer’s Apilo account.
Document transfer is confirmed after analysing the source, format and links to orders.
Apilo and ZYNQ use different data models. We map the meaning of products, listings, warehouses and rules rather than field names alone. The scope of order and document history is confirmed after technical analysis.
Clear answers before you decide to change systems.
No. Configuration and testing can run alongside daily work. The old system should be retired only after data, integrations and processes have been verified in ZYNQ.
Normally no. We plan the switch to avoid stopping incoming orders. Details depend on the number of channels, warehouses and synchronisation methods.
We first describe the business logic of existing rules, then reproduce the expected result using ZYNQ mechanisms. Screens and names may differ, but the agreed business outcome should remain consistent.
We assess whether it is critical for launch. A critical function can enter the pre-launch roadmap, while non-critical improvements may be scheduled after go-live.
Cost depends on processes, integrations, warehouses and data scope. You receive a clear scope and commercial conditions after analysis. Work never begins without approval.
Yes. Larger companies often start with one warehouse, channel or order group to reduce risk and collect team feedback.
Yes. Training is role-based. Warehouse staff, customer service, accounting and managers practise the processes they use every day.
We compare record counts, samples, inventory, integrations and automation results. Acceptance criteria are agreed before switching.
ZYNQ clients
See how companies of different sizes use one system for sales, inventory, logistics and profitability analysis.
ZYNQComplete online sales operations
BIG-MOT uses ZYNQ for its online store, B2B catalogue and Polish and international marketplaces. One process connects warehouses, dropshipping, ERP, shipping and customer service.
View case study
ZYNQ23% increase in sales margin
Auto Centrum combined multi-branch sales, warehouses and cost analysis in one system. Full order profitability helped increase the sales margin by 23%.
View case study
ZYNQE‑commerce distribution operations
Akces uses ZYNQ for B2B relationships, warehouse operations and domestic and international dropshipping. The system supports fast fulfillment, monitoring and partner invoicing.
View case studyNo obligation
Tell us about order volume, channels, warehouses and your main concern. We will explain honestly what can be transferred, how long it may take and where Apilo may still be the better choice.
Contact form
Tell us what you need. We will respond with a practical recommendation for using ZYNQ.
